Siaip galvoju apie Almagro pergale, nes Verdasko turetu but labiau pavarges. Bet zinant, kaip toli nueita ir koks geras turnyras, manau, geriausias pasirinkimas cia yra over'is. Visu pirma y akis krenta H2H. Lyderis cia Verdasko, bet is 13 setu, kuriuos yra suzaide sie du tenisininkai, buwo zaista net 7 Tie Breik'ai! Pratais metais, sie zaidejai susitiko 3 raunde ir per tris setus buwo suzaista net 34 geimai. Tiesiog netikiu, kad kazkuris laimes sausai, nors vakar visur suejo under, bet butent siame mace as matau atkaklia dvieju ispanu kova ir kaip minimum 4 setus. Sekmes
- Balsų: 0
Leemonte cia tau,
Fernando fought back the elements and some hand and foot issues to defeat the No. 30 seed Philipp Kohlschreiber of Germany, 2-6, 6-3, 6-3, 6-71, 6-4 in just over four hours, claiming a spot in the round of 16 and defending his points from last year. In addition to some service woes caused in part by the windy conditions (despite maintaining a high 75% first serve, Fernando served 15 total double faults for the match) and 61 total unforced errors, Fernando was also dealing with a blister on his racquet hand and broke the nail on his big toe on one foot and had to take three painkillers in order to continue playing.
“The truth is that there were times when even I was holding the tears of pain. It was a very difficult, very difficult match. When I lost the fourth set tie break, I thought I was more likely to lose than win it.
I took three pain pills, but the fourth set was a nightmare every time I put weight on my foot. I’ll see how I wake up tomorrow, and if necessary I’ll do some infiltration, but I am certain by removing the nail problem, I am one hundred percent. Winning against a tennis player like Kohlschreiber while dealing with so much pain makes me feel proud.”
1. "tau dar truksta kazkiek supratimo apie tenisa" - viska ko man reikia as suprantu puikiai, o kur tobuleti yra tiek man, tiek tau. Ir as labai tikiuosi tu neiskeli saves virs manes, nes to padaryti tu tiesiog neturi del ko... Vis dar nematau nei vienos prognozes prie tavo tinklapio...
2. "almagro aiskiai fiziskai yra silpniau pasirenges uz verdasco" - turnyras Romoje ant clay. Ketvirtas turas (pusfinalis) ir susitinka Verdascko - Ferrer. Antrame sete aiskiai dominavo ferrer, nors grybavo abu. Verdasko po to prisipazino, jog buvo nusikales. Taip, ten zaidziama buwo kasdien, cia reciau, bet ne robotai zaidzia ir nuowargis cia mazu maziausiai neturetu Labiau kamuoti Almagro - atvirksciai.
3. "almagro zaide tik su prastais zaidejais ir tai vos nepralose maco pries olanda haase" - ir po tos kovos likusius varzovus suvalge be problemu. Tiesiog neyvertino galbut.
4. "cia lb rimtas turnyras,favoritai,jam ruosies itin rimtai" - sitas jau tampa epic 😁 Tai kaip ruosesi ne favoritai😟 Visu pasiruosimas buvo maksimalus!
5. Netesiam sitos diskusijos. As parasiau savo nuomone, kuri nebutinai turi buti tesinga. Sekmes.
Leemonte. Kaip galima spresti kas yra patikimiau? Gal pirmus du setus suzais po tie breik'a ir rezultatas bus 1-1, tai kas tada butu patikimiau? Patikimiau bus nebent tada, kai pirmas 2-0 setais ir treciam bus 5-3 jo naudai 😁 )) Jei tikit sausa Verdasko pergale, tai kofas wirs 4 - jum pats tas. O as tikiu, kad Almagro seta ims kaip minimum. Nors nesu orakulas ir ateities nematau, bet sausai nuleistas setas zaidziant su Serra buwo keistas reiskinys, su Kohlschreiberiu zaisti 5 setai, o dabar gautas rimciausias priesininkas iki siol, kuris tikrai nera taip pavarges kaip Verdasko, todel man atrodo, kad mano pasirinkimas yra geresnis nei jusu. Bet kaip bus pamatysim rytoj. Atrasinet ne tik kad nebutina, bet ir nereikia 😁 sekmes